18 September 2022
5 min read
#Transport, Shipping & Logistics
Published by:
The National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR) has accepted an enforceable undertaking (EU) from equipment rental hire company, Pacific Hire Wangaratta Pty Ltd (PHW), after the operator failed to ensure one of its heavy vehicles complied with mass requirements.
In this article, we unpack the conduct that led to the severe mass breach, the accepted terms of the EU (including an unprecedented commitment to spend over $54,000 on mass education initiatives), and look at the reasons why, in this case, the NHVR again opted for an EU over enforcement by way of court proceedings.
On 29 September 2020, PHW permitted an employee to drive a company truck on a road at Dandenong South in Victoria without ensuring that the vehicle, its components and load, complied with mass limits.
The position of the load on the truck caused the weight to exceed the limit on the front steer axle group, which has a maximum permitted mass of 11,000 kg (11.0 tons) according to the NHVR’s General Mass Limits (GML). The mass that was allegedly detected on the front steer axles was 15.40 tons – almost 140 per cent of the prescribed GML, classifying the combination as a ‘severe risk breach’ under section 96(1) of the Heavy Vehicle National Law (HVNL). The maximum penalty for this type of breach (noting that multiple breaches of the HVNL may result from one incident) is $10,000 plus an additional maximum of $500 for every 1 per cent over a 120 per cent overload (not exceeding $20,000).
According to the EU, the jobsite did not allow the employee to access the deck of the truck to properly position the load. However, PHW accepted that it fell within the scope of its responsibilities to ensure that all vehicles and drivers complied with the HVNL and the HVNL Regulations regardless of the conditions of the jobsite.
The NHVR commenced prosecution against PHW with a maximum penalty of $68,970 for the breaches making up the offence.
PHW applied to the NHVR to propose an EU for the alleged contravention and it was accepted. The EU included the following four mass education initiatives:
The total estimated cost of the above mass education initiatives was an extraordinary $54,362.00.
In accepting PHW’s EU application under section 590A of the HVNL, the NHVR had regard to the EU Guideline we referred to in last month’s edition and the following considerations:
As set out in the NHVR’s reasons, the EU was preferred to prosecution in this case because:
The PHW case is another example of how an EU will be the preferred enforcement mechanism of the NHVR if it considers that more safety benefits will be achieved from the proposed initiatives than a court fine. This was clearly the case here, where PHW’s proposed and ultimately accepted EU involved spending large amounts of money on mass education initiatives that not only improved its internal safety practices but that had clear and potentially significant safety benefits for the industry as a whole.
Authors: Melanie Long & Isabella Costa
Disclaimer
The information in this article is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this article is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future.
Published by: