Felicia Prosser

Expertise

Felicia is a Special Counsel in our Dispute Resolution and Litigation team specialising in public and administrative law, Government, regulatory and corporate and commercial matters.

Experience

Felicia’s experience includes:

Public and administrative law, government and regulatory

acting for a Commonwealth government regulator in respect of Federal Court applications under the Administrative Decisions Judicial Review Act 1977 (Cth) for review of statutory decisions made under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth), and subsequent appeals
advising a Commonwealth government department in respect of Federal Court applications under the Administrative Decisions Judicial Review Act 1977 (Cth) for review of statutory decisions made under the Defence Regulation 2016 (Cth), and subsequent appeals
advising organisations in relation to government decision-making, policies and frameworks, statutory interpretation and regulatory issues
advising a telecommunications company on a consumer law risk assessment
arising from consumer compliance obligations imposed on it under an undertaking provided to the ACCC and the Federal Court under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
advising an airport on complex competition and consumer compliance matters, including ACCC consultations and production notices
working as part of the inquiry legal team within the UK Government Cabinet Office on the “Infected Blood Inquiry”, an independent public statutory inquiry chaired by Sir Brian Langstaff
advising a magic circle law firm in the UK on commercial, professional regulatory and employment matters, investigations and proceedings
working on a significant voluntary remediation project for a UK high street bank investigating the actions of a specific division of the bank established following the global financial crisis.

Corporate and commercial disputes and insolvency

acting for a mining company in unique Land Court compensation proceedings arising from special purpose legislation enacted by the Queensland Parliament
acting for parties in a large, complex mining joint venture dispute in the Queensland Supreme Court
acting for an international mining company in a dispute against a rail operator arising from rail construction and access contracts
acting for a pilotage services provider in respect of a misleading or deceptive conduct claim under the Australian Consumer Law
acting for minority shareholders in winding up- applications on ‘just and equitable’ grounds and on grounds of shareholder oppression acting for a director in respect of a cross- claim alleging the director was “knowingly concerned” in alleged contraventions of the Australian Consumer Law
acting for parties in relation to debt recovery and enforcement proceedings, including statutory demand disputes and winding-up in insolvency proceedings.

Upcoming Seminars

24 Feb 26

Workshop — building a litigation decision making matrix for your agency (Online)

Join Christine Jones and Rob Lawson as they lead a practical workshop on the following: Earlier in 2025, a client asked us for samples of a decision making matrix used by other agencies/states/tiers of government when considering whether to bring discretionary claims as plaintiff. In this workshop we will look at the matrix and tweak and challenge it under Chatham House Rules. You’ll then have a peer reviewed model which can be further customised for your agency. This session is being offered in-person and online.

Register now

24 Feb 26

Workshop — building a litigation decision making matrix for your agency (In-person)

Join Christine Jones and Rob Lawson as they lead a practical workshop on the following: Earlier in 2025, a client asked us for samples of a decision making matrix used by other agencies/states/tiers of government when considering whether to bring discretionary claims as plaintiff. In this workshop we will look at the matrix and tweak and challenge it under Chatham House Rules. You’ll then have a peer reviewed model which can be further customised for your agency. This session is being offered in-person and online.

Register now

25 Feb 26

How to bullet proof your legal research results with rigorous fact checking | Practice management and business skills

AI is transforming legal research, creating powerful new opportunities to enhance how lawyers work. While these tools offer significant time savings, sound research techniques and careful fact checking remain critical. In this session, Chief Knowledge Officer, Keren Smith, will explore how AI is reshaping legal research, practical prompting strategies, risk management considerations, and the latest Australian developments, alongside guidance on using free and paid tools effectively.

Special Counsel - Brisbane

Areas of Expertise

Contact Felicia

Expertise

Experience

Public and administrative law, government and regulatory

Corporate and commercial disputes and insolvency

Publications

What retailers can learn from Webjet’s $9 million penalty for misleading airfare pricing

Upcoming Seminars

Workshop — building a litigation decision making matrix for your agency (Online)

Register now

Workshop — building a litigation decision making matrix for your agency (In-person)

Register now

How to bullet proof your legal research results with rigorous fact checking | Practice management and business skills

Register now