Certifier’s duty of care to subsequent owners
In Dix Gardner Pty Ltd v The Owners - Strata Plan 82053  NSWSC 940, the Supreme Court considered an appeal by a certifier from a decision of the Local Court which found that the certifier had breached its duty of care to the owners corporation of a townhouse development located near the M2 motorway.
The builder of the townhouse development had engaged an acoustic consultant to conduct assessments regarding noise levels and any necessary acoustic treatments that were required for the development to be compliant. It was a condition of consent that a report from an acoustic consultant be submitted to the certifier.
Two reports were prepared by the acoustic consultant, one which set out the acoustic treatments that would be required and a second after the interim occupation certificate was issued and immediately prior to the certifier issuing a final occupation certificate. The second report stated that five of the townhouses in the development were non-compliant with noise criteria and required works to be conducted in respect of sealing the windows and frames. Despite this second report, the certifier issued a final occupation certificate for the development.
At first instance, the owners corporation argued that the certifier owed a duty to the owners corporation to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence in carrying out the certification, which was breached when the occupation certificate was issued despite the non-compliances recognised in the acoustic consultant’s second report.
The main ground of the certifier’s appeal was that the Court below should not have found that there was a duty of care owed to the owners corporation.
This was firstly argued on the basis that sections 41 and 43 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) (the CLA) applied as the certifier was exercising a public function in issuing occupation certificates under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW).
This argument was rejected both at first instance and on appeal on the basis that it is unlikely that the legislature intended for the CLA to capture privately employed certifiers unless the work they were doing involved “very difficult decisions” and the fine balancing of a discretion against public policy implications. As the work conducted by the certifier did not involve any exercise of discretion and primarily involved accessing mandatory and ascertainable prerequisites against a set standard, the Court found that the CLA was not relevant.
Secondly, the Court considered whether a certifier owed a duty of care to a subsequent purchaser, noting that on the facts, the owners corporation was neither a commercial entity (such as in Brookfield or Woolcock St) and not a lone purchaser of a domestic dwellings (as in Chan). Here, the Supreme Court upheld the first instance decision on the basis that it was clear that in the circumstances where the certifier signed a final occupation certificate, knowing that there were significant acoustic rectifications outstanding, he put the owners in a position of vulnerability. Despite being an owners corporation rather than an individual purchaser, each owner could not have been reasonably expected to have looked behind the occupation certificate in order to determine whether it had been properly issued.
Despite finding for the owners corporation in respect of the issue of duty of care, the appeal was upheld on other grounds, namely that the court below had not adequately addressed the issue of proportionate liability. The matter was remitted to the Local Court for further determination.
Editorial: Christine Jones, Georgia Appleby & Rebecca Kazzi
In the media
Serious questions at the Senate inquiry into building materials. Answers still pending
The Sydney Public Hearing by the Senate Economics Reference Committee into Non-Conforming Building Products (NCBPs) confirmed much of what the construction industry already knows (27 July 2017). More...
Project managers wanted as construction jobs boom rolls on
Project managers, construction managers and contract administrators are in massive demand as the home building boom has seen the construction sector in Australia increase its headcount by almost 70,000, a new report suggests (27 July 2017). More...
Strong demand for tradies in East Coast cities
The HIA Trades Availability Index for the June quarter of 2017 shows that there is a small undersupply of skilled trades people in the residential building industry in Australia,” added Mr Reardon. The greatest shortage of trades is in those markets that still have high levels of home building, such as Sydney and Melbourne (26 July 2017). More...
Here's how many buildings in NSW might have dangerous cladding
More than a 1,000 buildings in New South Wales may contain potentially dangerous cladding, a Government audit finds (28 July 2017). More...
HIA: New Levy will only worsen housing affordabiltiy - NSW
Today’s announcement by the Government to develop a new 20 year blueprint for Greater Parramatta will see as many as 72,000 homes built and 110,000 jobs created is welcome says the Housing Industry Association (HIA) (25 July 2017). More...
Residents warn 'huge fight' ahead over proposed North Sydney smokestacks
North Sydney residents say they will challenge the Government's plans to build polluting smokestacks near schools, homes and parks as part of the Northern Beaches tollway (21 July 2017). More...
Practice and courts
Fire Safety Regulation Reform
The Environmental Planning Assessment Amendment (Fire Safety and Building Certification) Regulation 2017 has been published and will come into effect on 1 October 2017. These are important reforms that will improve fire safety in new and existing buildings. The amendments introduce new requirements affecting the design, approval, construction and maintenance of fire safety measures (06 July 2017). More...
NSW BPB: Strata building bond scheme now commences 1 January 2018
The new strata building bond and inspection scheme will now commence on 1 January 2018. It was originally scheduled to commence on 1 July 2017. More...
Champion Homes Sales Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Fair Trading  NSWCATOD 110
Home Building Act 1989 – disciplinary action for breach of statutory warranty penalty of $3,500 set aside – caution.
Dix Gardner Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan 82053  NSWSC 940
LOCAL COURT APPEAL – jointly and severally liable - duty of care – duty of care to subsequent purchaser – vulnerability – assumption of reliance – appeal upheld.
Ferraro v Lambert  NSWCATAP 162
Home-building – notice to renew proceedings – appellant inadvertently misled by orders of Tribunal – denial of procedural fairness – question of law – could not be concluded that denial of procedural fairness made no difference to the outcome.
John Maiolo t/as M & N Peninsular Kitchens & Joinery v Chiarelli  NSWSC 982
APPEALS – judicial review – appeal from NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Appeal Panel –on question of law only with leave - installation of kitchen – specific performance of contract ordered by Appeal Panel – Appeal Panel gave no concomitant order for Defendant to pay for kitchen upon it being installed – whether denial of procedural fairness by failing to respond to Plaintiff’s applications to amend orders – failure to give reasons – failure to respond to Plaintiff’s substantial, clearly articulated argument – constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction – appeal upheld – matter remitted to Appeal Panel.
COSTS – Appeal Panel made no order as to costs – s 60 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act - whether special circumstances shown - whether costs should be awarded because proceedings alleged to have been brought for a collateral purpose – post-judgment conduct irrelevant to costs orders – proportionality – small amount in dispute – whether any reason shown for leave to be granted - leave to appeal refused – no order as to costs.
Tannous v Leedon  NSWCATAP 158
APPEAL – failure of appellant to appear at hearing below – no adequate explanation provided for that failure – expert evidence filed by the appellant considered by the Member in the decision under appeal – no error of law – leave to appeal required – no evidence provided to found the grant of leave; APPEAL – simultaneous lodging of appeal with an application to set aside the decision of the Member – entitlement to pursue the set aside application doubted – Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulation, cl 9; Home Building Act 1989 - Confirm the order made in proceedings HB16/17038 on 23 September 2016 that the Appellant is to pay the Respondent the sum of $77,100 immediately.
Staniland v Integrity New Homes Pty Ltd  NSWCATAP 157
Costs- Legislation applicable to the award of costs in pending proceedings commenced prior to establishment day of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Discretion- Factors relevant to exercise of discretion, reduction of costs of successful party, findings of fact by primary member - the appellants filed application HB 13/50125 (renewal proceedings) in which the appellants sought to renew the original proceedings. The appellants contended that the respondent had failed to carry out the work as required by the July orders. The appellants sought an order for the payment of $20,000.
Walsh v Sandeberg  NSWCATAP 152
Indemnity costs - Rejection of ‘Calderbank’ Offer.
Christine Jones, Partner - Construction & Infrastructure (Dispute Resolution)
T: +61 2 8083 0477
Cameron Sheather, Partner - Planning, Property & Environment
T: +61 2 8083 0461
The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources.