The Queensland Parliament has passed legislation to introduce a class action regime in the Queensland Supreme Court.[i] Representative proceedings (or class actions) enable one person to bring an action on behalf of multiple claimants whose claims are in respect of, or arise out of the same, similar or related circumstances, and give rise to a substantial common issue of law or fact.
As set out in our last update, the legislation brings Queensland into line with class action regimes that have been in place for decades in the Victorian and NSW Supreme Courts and the Federal Court.[ii] This comes off the back of Queensland losing out to NSW for the high profile 2011 Flood Class Action which goes to trial in the NSW Supreme Court next year. Other high profile class actions have been commenced in the Federal Court, including the class action brought by investors in the Clem 7 tunnel against the traffic forecaster AECOM and owner operator, RiverCity Motorway.
The new regime
The Act introduces Part 13A, “Representative Proceedings in Supreme Court” into the Civil Proceedings Act 2011 (Qld) which provides for a comprehensive statutory regime to facilitate the effective conduct and management of representative proceedings in Queensland. The Act provides the following class action regime:
What does this mean for you?
Class actions raising a cause of action in Queensland will be able to be brought in the Queensland Supreme Court. The regime will commence on a date to be fixed by proclamation and will only apply to proceedings commenced after the commencement of regime (even though the cause of action may have arisen before the commencement of the regime).[x]
The regime will be closely monitored by litigation funders, particularly following the decision in Money Max Int Pty Ltd (Trustee) v QBE Insurance Group Limited[xi] where the Full Federal Court approved a ‘common fund’ doctrine finding that all class members should pay the same pro rata share of legal costs and funding commission regardless of whether they had entered into a funding agreement with the litigation funder.
Businesses should check that their insurance policies provide cover for class actions and consider the parts of their business where they may be vulnerable to class actions.
[i] Limitation of Actions (Child Sexual Abuse) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2016 (Qld) which amends the Civil Proceedings Act 2011 (Qld).
[ii] In the Federal Court of Australia under the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) (Part IVA), in Victoria under the Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic) (Part 4A) and in New South Wales under the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) (Part 10).
[iii] Section 103B “Starting proceeding”.
[iv] Section 103D “Whether consent required to be a group member”.
[v] Section 103T “When notice must be given”.
[vi] Section 103G “Right of group member to opt out”.
[vii] Section 103X “Effect of Judgment”.
[viii] Section 103V “Judgment”.
[ix] Section 103W “Constitution etc. of fund”
[x] Section 2 “Commencement and Section 111 “Application of pt 13A”.
[xi] Money Max Int Pty Ltd (Trustee) v QBE Insurance Group Limited  FCAFC 148.
Toby Boys, Partner
T: +61 7 3135 0649
The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources.