Artboard 1Icon/UI/CalendarIcons/Ionic/Social/social-pinterest

New Orders for Construction Sites in NSW

21 May 20 - In the News

Published by Victoria Gordon

Author: Holding Redlich Head of Procurement, Scott Alden and Associate, Victoria Gordon

Publication: Sourceable

Publication date: 21/05/2020

Two key legislative updates affecting building sites have been implemented due to COVID-19:

  • order under section 10.17 (COVID-19 pandemic—Ministerial orders) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) (Development Consent Order)
  • Environmental Planning and Assessment (COVID-19 Development—Construction Work Days) Order 2020 (Working Days Order).

The Development Consent Order allows the Planning Minister, in consultation with the Health Minister, to make an order to authorise a development to be carried out on land without the need for any approval under the EP&A Act or consent from any person.

The Health Minister must be reasonably satisfied that the making of the order is necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare of members of the public during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the order could remain in force until 25 September 2020, or for a longer period if extended by regulation.

The Working Days Order allows construction activities to occur on a Saturday, Sunday and on Public Holidays from 2 April 2020, irrespective of any conditions in the relevant development consent, provided that:

  1. Social distancing rules are complied with
  2. No noisy work, such as rock breaking, rock hammering and sheet piling, is undertaken
  3. The hours of operation that apply to the working week are complied with.

Practical implications
While the orders are designed to allow projects to be more flexible, cash to be injected into the construction industry and construction jobs be kept secure, the following practical considerations arise:

1) The Contract: What does the contract actually say about working hours and days? Is it the case that the Contractor must only comply with the relevant Conditions of Consent, or that the working hours and days are set by the Principal, with changes to be approved by the Superintendent (in writing)? In the former case, the Contractor can simply go ahead and make the change to the working hours. In the latter case, they would not be able to do this without approval, despite it being law, because changes are subject to approval.

2) Budget impacts: Who will be bear the cost of working on the weekend or public holidays? Weekend and public holiday rates will inevitably lead to higher labour costs. Parties will need to consider if this is dealt with under the contract, and how this will affect the overall project budget.

3) Work health and safety (WHS) risk: Are extended hours putting employees at risk? Contractors will need to ensure their employees are not working overtime hours that are in breach of employment laws or that such extended hours do not put their employees at risk of injury or accident.

4) Modern slavery: Are the orders putting vulnerable workers at increased risk of modern slavery? The construction industry is a high risk industry for modern slavery instances. Parties need to ensure the increased economic pressure businesses face due to COVID-19, together with high weekend rates, do not lead to the exploitation of vulnerable workers.

5) Social distancing breaches: How are social distancing rules being applied on work sites where close contact is required? Confined space work, or WHS considerations which require two workers to be in close proximity to one another will inevitably breach social distancing rules. Parties will need to ensure their workers are safe from the risk of contracting COVID-19 by following social distancing rules, where practicable, and performing certain physical checks on workers before they are permitted on site (e.g. temperature checks).

The construction industry has had to adapt to COVID-19. New legislative orders aimed to support the construction industry are encouraging, but parties need to ensure that measures are practical and that worker safety remains paramount.

Published by Victoria Gordon

Share this

You might be interested in

15 January 2021 - In the News

Australia: A peek into the dark web with the proposed new surveillance legislation

Holding Redlich partner Angela Flannery discusses the Australian Government's proposed new surveillance legislation and how it differs from the existing legal framework in this area, alongside how the two may interact, with OneTrust DataGuidance.

07 January 2021 - In the News

AAT overturns decision denying sole trader access to JobKeeper

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal has reversed a decision from the Taxation Commissioner that denied a sole trader access to the JobKeeper program.

05 January 2021 - In the News

Sole trader triumphs in JobKeeper test case

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal has overturned an ATO decision to deny a sole trader access to JobKeeper after it found that his backdated ABN registration satisfied the integrity rules.