17 July 2018
2 min read
#Planning, Environment & Sustainability
Published by:
When a public acquisition overlay is applied to land, the Planning and Environment Act 1987 gives the owner of the land rights to seek compensation from the acquiring authority where, upon sale of the land, the sale price is lower than expected as a consequence of the existence of the overlay.
In a recent decision, Capela v Minister for Energy, Environment and Climate Change [2018] VSC 360, a public acquisition overlay was introduced, however the owner died before she was able to sell her land and trigger a claim for compensation.
The executors of the estate of Mrs Liptak applied to the Supreme Court for a declaration to the effect that they were eligible to make a ‘loss on sale’ claim under the Planning and Environment Act 1987 upon sale of the subject land.
A public acquisition overlay was applied to the subject land in 2010. The landowner, Mrs Liptak, died on 22 January 2016, and the plaintiffs were appointed executors of her estate on 22 March 2016 upon probate being granted.
Justice Emerton found that the executors (despite having registered interests on the title to the land) were not ‘owners’ for the purposes of the loss on sale provisions of the Act as they did not own the land at the time that the land was reserved (2010): “Mrs Liptak’s entitlement to claim compensation from the planning authority for financial loss caused by the Reservation effectively dies with her” (at age 67).
An alternative argument put forward by the plaintiffs was that executors were ‘entitled to be registered’ as proprietors of the land for the purposes of the definition of ‘owners’ in section 3 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. Justice Emerton rejected this argument and found that the executors had no entitlement to be registered as proprietors of the land until the testator was deceased.
The full decision can be accessed here.
Author: Tess Kerridge
Holding Redlich is a market leader with a strong track record in the implementation of major land projects. Our experience includes acting in contested claims for compulsory acquisition compensation at all stages of the dispute process, from valuer conferences through to disputes before VCAT and the Supreme Court.
Disclaimer
The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this newsletter is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future.
Published by:
